Ebenezer
TheEbenezer News

World

De Gaulle: Résistance review – a gallopingbromance for Churchill and France’s wartime hero

This biopic of the great Gallic general – which culminates at Bir Hakeim, in advance of a second film – is a fine, quietly amusing romp with a touch of classic 60s war films

Read full story on The Guardian
Peter Bradshaw26 Aug 2026, 10:00 amUpdated 1h ago4 min readFilmFilm
De Gaulle: Résistance review – a galloping bromance for Churchill and France’s wartime hero

FilmPeter Bradshaw

Perhaps because it is based on a biography by an Englishman – Julian Jackson’s A Certain Idea of France: The Life of Charles de Gaulle – this very enjoyable and gallopingly eventful biopic, directed by Antonin Baudry, has an element of amused detachment. The first of two parts, it offers a good-humoured, though naturally sympathetic, perspective on France’s great wartime hero, played with martyred and faintly preposterous hauteur by Franco-Armenian actor Simon Abkarian.

De Gaulle is the lofty exile in London, refusing to accept the dishonour of the Vichy government and its capitulation to the Nazis, symbolised by Marshal Philippe Pétain (Alain Libolt) and Adm François Darlan (Mathieu Kassovitz). For reasons that will later become clear, De Gaulle’s own story is mysteriously intertwined with that of a hothead young patriot, Fernand Bonnier de la Chapelle (Florian Lesieur), who is De Gaulle’s biggest fan. A tiny touch of comedy is part of what makes this resemble an old-fashioned 60s war film, although it has evidently taken until 2026 for French cinema to come to terms with its contentious national icon. No one here is cheeky enough to comment on the nominative determinism of a Gallic hero being called “De Gaulle”.

His great supporter (and even, in some ways, creator) after the fall of France in 1940 is Winston Churchill, played with great gusto and charm by Simon Russell Beale – incidentally, it is a relief to see a commercial movie role worthy of the man. I can’t think of any other film portrayal of Churchill in which most of his dialogue is in French; this is how he mostly talks with De Gaulle. Was Churchill’s French really as good as that? Churchill’s attitude is exasperated, affectionate and occasionally furious, but he recognises in De Gaulle a kindred spirit: a romantic maverick and patriot. Beale gives his extended dialogue scenes with Abkarian, genially quaffing champagne, a touch of Shakespeare. I wonder if the second film will include the legendary moment when De Gaulle is asked who the three most important Europeans are, and promptly replies: “Dante, Goethe, Chateaubriand.” When asked about Shakespeare, he shrugs: “European?”

The film also breathlessly gives us De Gaulle’s arrival in Britain after the French collapse, where he is cunningly promoted by Churchill as the true keeper of the French flame to undermine Vichy. He is given staff, a house and permitted to make BBC broadcasts rallying the cause of French resistance, for all of which De Gaulle is hilariously ungrateful. He then assembles a ragtag group of expatriates as his cabinet, like the prisoners in John Sturges’s The Great Escape joining the great plan. De Gaulle impassively accepts the horror of Churchill’s ruthless bombing of the French fleet at the Algerian port of Mers-el-Kébir in 1940, killing nearly 1,300 French servicemen, to prevent this force falling into Nazi hands. The film suggests that De Gaulle, with a ruthless realpolitik of his own, saw the importance of propitiating Churchill, while seeing Mers-el-Kébir as a judgment on Vichy cowardice.

Then, we get the high comedy of De Gaulle’s chaotic personal adventures in Africa, finding support for his Free French in Chad and Cameroon, which Churchill admires as audacious if absurd. But Africa is important. An Anglo-Hollywood movie might have seen Britain’s turning point in the war as a matter of dramatising Montgomery’s brilliance at El-Alamein . This French movie instead emphasises the heroism of an outnumbered Free French brigade in the desert at Bir Hakeim under Gen Marie-Pierre Kœnig (Benoît Magimel); inspired by De Gaulle, they hold out against Rommel’s superior forces, giving British forces a chance to retreat and regroup.

And so, De Gaulle falls in and out of favour with the British, who are nervous that the comic opera of his political career in London will undermine Britain in the eyes of US President Franklin D Roosevelt (Campbell Scott). And the film shows us De Gaulle and Churchill’s differing views of the American saviour. The film rattles along with De Gaulle’s return to the inner circles of allied power after sensational events in Africa – and stops. The second film will presumably take the story on from there. But this one, entertainingly, is a kind of bromance or double-act with Churchill, a wartime duo heading for glory and then the long fadeout of post imperial peacetime.

• De Gaulle: Résistance is in UK and Irish cinemas from 28 August.

De Gaulle is the lofty exile in London, refusing to accept the dishonour of the Vichy government and its capitulation to the Nazis, symbolised by Marshal Philippe Pétain (Alain Libolt) and Adm François Darlan (Mathieu Kassovitz). For reasons that will later become clear, De Gaulle’s own story is mysteriously intertwined with that of a hothead young patriot, Fernand Bonnier de la Chapelle (Florian Lesieur), who is De Gaulle’s biggest fan. A tiny touch of comedy is part of what makes this resemble an old-fashioned 60s war film, although it has evidently taken until 2026 for French cinema to come to terms with its contentious national icon. No one here is cheeky enough to comment on the nominative determinism of a Gallic hero being called “De Gaulle”.

This report is published with credit to The Guardian. Full available text from the wire is above. Read on The Guardian

Source: The Guardian · Peter Bradshaw. Published 26 Aug 2026, 10:00 am.

Keep reading

Back to the desk