India
The Supreme Court reduced judicial service practice from three years to one. This change sparks debate on courtroom experience versus structured training. Former Justice Vipin Sanghi advocates for retaining the three-year practice period. Lawyers Vivek Narayan Sharma and Siddhart
Read full story on Times of India →
India — SAURABH THAKUR
The Supreme Court reduced judicial service practice from three years to one. This change sparks debate on courtroom experience versus structured training. Former Justice Vipin Sanghi advocates for retaining the three-year practice period. Lawyers Vivek Narayan Sharma and Siddharth Sijoria believe the new framework can succeed. The discussion centers on readiness for judicial responsibilities and accessibility.
This report is published with credit to Times of India. The wire sent a summary; open the original for any extra context. Read on Times of India →
Source: Times of India · SAURABH THAKUR. Published 27 Aug 2026, 11:54 am.
Most relevant
Congress alleges business boom for Harish Rao-linked firms during BRS rule
Read on The Hindu →